Blog

CFA Piling machine in operation
CFA Piling machine in operation
CFA Piling machine in operation

Difference Between CFA Piling and Driven Piles: Choosing the Right Foundation

Compare CFA Piling vs. Driven Piles. Understand the differences, benefits, and ideal applications for continuous auger and driven pile methods in piling construction.

In the diverse world of piling construction, selecting the most appropriate deep foundation technique is a critical decision that impacts project efficiency, cost, and environmental considerations. Two prominent methods often considered by piling contractors and piling companies are CFA piling and driven piling. While both create robust pilings to support structures, their methodologies, advantages, and ideal applications differ significantly. Understanding the nuances between continuous flight auger (CFA) piles and driven piles is essential for making informed choices in your next construction venture.

Understanding CFA Piling

CFA piling, also known as Continuous Flight Auger piles or simply continuous auger piles, is a cast-in-situ technique. The process involves drilling a hollow-stemmed continuous flight auger into the ground to the required depth. As the auger is steadily withdrawn, concrete is simultaneously pumped through its hollow core, filling the void from the bottom up. This continuous process ensures the stability of the bore, even in unstable or water-bearing soils, creating a seamless CFA pile. The method is praised for its efficiency and ability to produce high-quality cfa piles with minimal spoil. Sometimes mistakenly called flighty auger piles, the correct term emphasizes the continuous nature of the auger.

Understanding Driven Piling

Driven piling involves the installation of pre-formed driven pile elements into the ground using a large hammer or vibratory equipment. These driven piles can be made of concrete, steel, or timber and are fabricated off-site to specific lengths and strengths. The piling rig lifts the driven pile into position and then repeatedly impacts or vibrates it until it reaches the desired depth or refusal, effectively displacing the soil as it descends. This technique relies on the compaction of surrounding soil to enhance bearing capacity and lateral stability for the installed pilings.

Key Differences in Methodology and Impact

The fundamental difference between CFA piling and driven piling lies in their installation methods and their impact on the surrounding environment:

  • Installation Method:

    • CFA Piling: Bored, cast-in-situ. Soil is extracted, and concrete is pumped in.

    • Driven Piling: Displacement method. Pre-formed piles are hammered or vibrated into the ground, pushing soil aside.


  • Noise and Vibration:

    • CFA Piling: Generally much quieter and produces less vibration, making continuous flight auger CFA piles ideal for urban areas or near sensitive structures.

    • Driven Piling: Can generate significant noise and vibration, which might be a concern in residential or built-up areas.


  • Spoil Generation:

    • CFA Piling: Generates spoil (drilled soil) that needs to be managed and disposed of.

    • Driven Piling: Typically generates minimal to no spoil, as soil is displaced laterally.


  • Ground Conditions:

    • CFA Piling: Highly versatile across a wide range of ground conditions, including unstable and water-bearing soils, as the bore is supported by the concrete pressure.

    • Driven Piling: Most effective in cohesive soils (clays) or loose granular soils where compaction is beneficial. Can be challenging in very dense ground or where obstructions are present.


  • Depth and Diameter: Both methods can achieve significant depths, but CFA piling offers more flexibility in varying diameters on-site.

When to Choose CFA Piling

CFA piling is often preferred by piling companies for:

  • Projects in urban or residential areas where noise and vibration restrictions apply.

  • Sites with variable or unstable ground conditions.

  • Projects requiring very deep foundations.

  • Situations where precise control over the pile's dimensions and integrity is crucial.

  • Where the disposal of minimal spoil is manageable.

The versatility of the continuous flight auger makes it a go-to for many modern piling construction challenges.

When to Choose Driven Piling

Driven piling remains a strong choice for:

  • Remote or open sites where noise and vibration are less of a concern.

  • Projects in stable, suitable ground conditions (e.g., firm clay, dense sand).

  • Situations where minimal spoil generation is a priority.

  • Where pre-fabricated quality control is desired.

  • Large-scale projects requiring rapid installation in consistent ground.

Expert piling contractors will conduct thorough ground investigations to recommend the most suitable pile piling method.

In Conclusion

Both CFA piling and driven piling are robust and reliable piling types used to create essential deep foundations. While continuous flight auger CFA piles offer advantages in noise reduction, versatility, and precision, driven piles provide rapid installation and minimal spoil in appropriate conditions. The choice between these two powerful piling techniques ultimately depends on the specific demands of the project, including site constraints, ground conditions, environmental regulations, and budget. Partnering with experienced piling companies who understand the intricacies of both cfa piling and driven pile installation is key to ensuring the success and longevity of your piling construction project.

Table of Contents